Reply to comment

Don't we agree?

I greatly appreciate your response!

I have a few reactions. You said: "Are there bad teachers? Yes, you know it and I know it. Empower you administration to fire them, stop protecting the bad teachers. The bad news is we can't protect the "good" teachers, either. De-regulate licensing for teachers, empower administrators, give school vouchers, and hold parents and kids responsible for their own education."

I completely agree with those suggestions. Fire the bad teachers. That's ultimately what I want. But the unions are not allowing systems to be put in play that will allow for this firing. In order to fire them, you need a criteria upon which to base this decision. You need to have established criteria, and I believe that part of that criteria should be how they perform on standardized tests. If a teacher has students who can't add and subtract, and all of their students fail, then of course the administrator better have a brain and realize that this is not a criteria for firing them.

Ultimately, my question is this: all of the proposals you mention (stop protecting the bad teachers, de-regulate licensing for teachers, empower administrators, give school vouchers, and hold parents and kids responsible for their own education): are the teacher unions actually supporting any of these initiatives? Not just by what they say, but by what they DO?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.

More information about formatting options